Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Assault Weapons Ban

This data was compiled from Mother Jones' Guide to Mass Shootings in America.  Mother Jones research has focused on seemingly indiscriminate rampages in public places resulting in three or more victims killed.  I've heard often that the assault weapons ban had no impact on public safety.  I'll post the numbers and you can decide for yourself.

SUM of FatalitiesSUM of WoundedSUM of Total victimsSum of Fatalities prior to Assault Weapons BanSum of Wounded Prior to Assault Weapons BanSum of Total Victims Prior to Assault Weapons Ban12 years
19828311Prior161185346
1984282048Prior
198615621Prior
198761420Prior
19887411Prior
1989154156Prior
199010414Prior
1991352661Prior
199291019Prior
1993233457Prior
199452328Enacted September 13, 1994Sum of Fatalities during Assault Weapons BanSum of Wounded during Assault Weapons BanSum of Total Victims during Assault Weapons Ban10 years
1995606During101108209
1996617During
19979514During
1998143650During
1999424789During
2000707During
2001549During
20037815During
20045712Expired September 13, 2004Sum of Fatalities since expiration of Assault Weapons BanSum of Wounded since expiration of Assault Weapons BanSum of Total Victims since expiration of Assault Weapons Ban12 years
200517926After406354760
200621728After
2007543286After
2008182442After
2009393877After
20109211After
2011192140After
20127268140After
2013351348After
2014182846After
2015464389After
20165869127After
Grand Total6686471315

I'm not going to assert that a one variable equation is the only difference in these numbers.  I'm not going to pretend that there are not deeper societal problems that contribute.  But when I just look at the numbers, I think an assault weapon ban can only be viewed as a step in the right direction.

When one group (gun owners) has the power to force their will on the entire nation with this kind of data indicating a real threat to public safety, something is significantly out of balance.

Look at the data.  Here is a link to the full data set: Mother Jones Mass Shootings Database

If the data moves you as it does me, contact your senators and congressman.  Silence is acceptance. 

And for me, this is unacceptable.

4 comments:

  1. So, given everything that's happened over the years, and the data you've got here, there "may" be a slight difference between the date ranges, and as an auditor, I'm trained to look at risk and vulnerabilities. If the ability for bad people to kill is increased because of the ease of access, then cutting off that access helps minimize risk and reduce a vulnerability. However, I would also argue that if bad people want to kill they will always find a way. The unfortunate event in Orlando would have happened if the killer wasn't able to get a weapon legally. He would have borrowed, stolen, gotten something off the streets, or found another option, such as explosives. Also, look at what happened in Paris. The latest issue was a knife, and they have the strictest gun laws in Europe.

    My point is simple. I'm always in favor of minimizing risk and reducing vulnerability, but we have to look at everything as a whole, including root causes. There's simply a LOT more to this than the availability of assault weapons.

    Thanks for posting this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So, given everything that's happened over the years, and the data you've got here, there "may" be a slight difference between the date ranges, and as an auditor, I'm trained to look at risk and vulnerabilities. If the ability for bad people to kill is increased because of the ease of access, then cutting off that access helps minimize risk and reduce a vulnerability. However, I would also argue that if bad people want to kill they will always find a way. The unfortunate event in Orlando would have happened if the killer wasn't able to get a weapon legally. He would have borrowed, stolen, gotten something off the streets, or found another option, such as explosives. Also, look at what happened in Paris. The latest issue was a knife, and they have the strictest gun laws in Europe.

    My point is simple. I'm always in favor of minimizing risk and reducing vulnerability, but we have to look at everything as a whole, including root causes. There's simply a LOT more to this than the availability of assault weapons.

    Thanks for posting this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Original comment deleted to fix a typo. I couldn't figure out another way to edit.

      I agree, this is a complex issue, and has many factors that could be addressed. I guess my biggest struggle is why these weapons exist and are owned by citizens at all. They are killing machines. And yes, the bad people will find lawless ways to achieve their goals, but I would like to make it more difficult for them. And I'm sick at heart that this nation continues to do nothing in the face of the increasing carnage.

      Delete